Contact Us Blog Careers Publications Attorneys Practice Areas Our Work The Firm Home

July 28, 2009

Newslink: US Wind Installations Proceeding at Record Pace

The Wall Street Journal writes that the pace of installations of wind-powered megawatts, while down from the first quarter, is nonetheless at a record midyear level in 2009 compared to the prior year, according to data released by the American Wind Energy Association.  Read the full story at Environmental Capital.



July 21, 2009

NYSDEC Issues Final Policy On Assessing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Environmental Impact Statements

The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (“DEC”) recently issued its final policy on Assessing Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Environmental Impact Statements, dated July 15, 2009 (the “Policy”), a draft of which was released for public review and comment in March 2009 (the “March 2009 Draft”).  The Policy applies to DEC staff review of environmental impact statements (“EISs”) when DEC is the lead or involved agency under the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”) and energy use or greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions have either been identified as significant impacts in the positive declaration or are required to be analyzed in an EIS as a result of scoping.

The Policy requires the analysis of direct and indirect emissions from both stationary and mobile sources and provides guidance as to how such emissions should be quantified.  It provides specific guidance for assessing methane emissions from landfills, emissions from waste generation and building energy use.  The Policy requires the analysis of GHG emissions of alternatives evaluated in the EIS.  It also requires an assessment of the GHG reductions possible through the implementation of mitigation measures (including those that are considered and rejected).  The Policy specifies that preference is be given to on-site mitigation measures and sets forth a number of examples in the following categories: building design and operation measures, efficiency or mitigation measures for on-site GHG sources, site selection and design measures, transportation measures and waste reduction or management measures.

Multiple commentors requested that DEC provide guidance as to when a proposed project’s impacts should be considered “significant”.  DEC declined to do so, noting in its response to comments that “the Policy merely provides methodologies for assessing GHG and energy use” and referring project proponents to the Environmental Assessment Form (“EAF”), which is being revised to include questions regarding energy use and GHGs,[1] as a tool for determining significance.

The Policy and DEC’s responses to the comments received on the March 2009 Draft are available at http://www.dec.ny.gov/regulations/56552.html.


[1] The EAF is an Appendix to the SEQRA regulations; accordingly, such revisions will be the subject of a formal rulemaking process.



July 7, 2009

EPA Warns States Over Lax Clean Water Act Enforcement

By: Jonathan Kalmuss-Katz — Filed under: Clean Water Act, Enforcement — Posted at 5:46 pm

In recent weeks, EPA has increased pressure on states to improve their enforcement of the Clean Water Act’s permitting programs, potentially indicating a new environmental priority for the Obama Administration.  Clean Water Act permitting is administered largely through programs undertaken pursuant to authority delegated by EPA to the states, including New York, with traditionally limited direct federal involvement.

In a July 2 memo, however, EPA Administration Lisa Jackson warned, “[t]he level of significant non-compliance with permitting requirements is unacceptably high and the level of enforcement activity is unacceptably low … We must make sure that strong and effective action is taken when serious violations of law threaten water quality, and we must boost EPA’s enforcement presence against serious violators.”

Following that memo, EPA has posted new data on the status of states’ Clean Water Act enforcement online, along with reports assessing the effectiveness of these delegated programs.  New York had the second largest total number of non-compliant major facilities in 2008 (276), and its major facility non-compliance rate (82%) was higher than the national average (55%).  Many of these violations were technical, however, and the rate of significant non-compliance for major New York facilities (19.5%) was lower than average (24.4%).

Under the Clean Water Act, EPA retains the authority to withdraw a state’s permitting authority “where the state’s enforcement program fails to comply with” federal requirements.  40 C.F.R. § 123.63.  While federal revocation is a rare and extreme step, and Jackson’s memo recognized the critical state role in Clean Water Act permitting, EPA’s increased attention may spur some states to step up their own enforcement efforts.



« Newer Posts