Contact Us Blog Careers Publications Attorneys Practice Areas Our Work The Firm Home

Once Again, First Department Overturns Improper Exclusion of Property from Brownfield Cleanup Program

By: Bridget M. Lee

On Wednesday, February 11, the First Department of the New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, held for the second time that the Department of Environmental Conservation (“DEC”) improperly excluded a Manhattan property from the Brownfield Cleanup Program (“BCP”) HLP Properties, LLC v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, — N.Y.S.2d —-, 2010 WL 455321 (1st Dept. Feb. 11, 2010) (“HLP”).

As it has argued in several cases, DEC contended that the property in question did not meet the eligibility criteria for a “brownfield” because the Site was already subject to a voluntary cleanup agreement.  In a unanimous decision, the Court held that DEC had “improperly departed from statutory criteria,” noting that this result was “compelled” by its recent decision in East River Realty Co., LLC v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, 68 A.D.3d 564, 891 N.Y.S.2d 359 (1st Dept. 2009) (“ERRC”), which rejected such arguments by DEC.  As it had held in ERRC, the First Department also held that remand to DEC for a new determination was unnecessary in light of the extensive record before it.

HLP represents the third consecutive Appellate Division decision striking down DEC’s efforts to exclude properties from the BCP based on extra-statutory factors.  See also Destiny USA Dev., LLC v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, 63 A.D.3d 1568 (4th Dept. 2009) (“Destiny”).

The Court of Appeals will soon address related issues in a different context, having recently heard oral argument in an appeal where DEC’s exclusion of property was upheld based on DEC’s conclusion that the contaminants at issue did not exceed levels that would require remediation.  Lighthouse Point Property Assocs. v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, 61 A.D.3d 1438 (4th Dept. 2009).  HLP, ERRC, and Destiny all involved sites where the contaminant levels were significantly above DEC’s remediation standards, and where DEC conceded that remediation was necessary.

SPR represented HLP and ERRC in connection with their challenges to DEC’s exclusion of their property from the BCP.  For more information, please contact Daniel Riesel, Mark Chertok, Jeff Gracer, or Michael Bogin.

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment