Contact Us Blog Careers Publications Attorneys Practice Areas Our Work The Firm Home

April 9, 2010

DEC Accepting Comments on Proposed Green Remediation Policy Until April 30

DEC recently released its proposed policy document DER-31: Green Remediation, which sets forth DEC’s preference for remediating sites in a way that promotes sustainability.  The new policy would apply to the investigation and remediation of sites under DEC’s Spill Response Program, the Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Site Remedial Program, the Environmental Restoration Program, the Brownfield Cleanup Program and the Voluntary Cleanup Program.  It would apply to all activities at new sites and to subsequent phases of investigation or remediation at sites currently in those programs.

The draft identifies the major green concepts to be considered, which include reducing greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions, increasing energy efficiency, reducing waste and increasing recycling, and maximizing habitat value and creating habitat where possible.  In addition, DEC identifies specific techniques that could be employed to “green” a remedial option, such as utilizing clean diesel to reduce emissions, incorporating green building design and utilizing native vegetation to reduce water usage. DEC repeatedly emphasizes that concepts of green remediation cannot be used to justify the “no action” alternative or to support a less protective remedy.

Notably, for state-funded cleanups, DEC would now require the use of renewable energy and/or the purchase of renewable energy credits to offset 100% of the electricity required to implement a remedy.  For other remedial projects, DEC would “strongly encourage[e]” compliance with this requirement, unless a site-specific evaluation demonstrated that it was impracticable or favored an alternative green approach.

All remedial alternatives analysis and decision documents would be required to describe those green remediation principles considered in the remedy selection process.  In addition, such documents would now have to include an analysis of GHG emissions and options to minimize such emissions.  Final engineering reports would also need to include a discussion of the green remediation techniques utilized in the remedial program.

A copy of the proposed policy is available here (pdf).  DEC is accepting comments on the draft until April 30, 2010.



April 7, 2010

EPA and NHTSA Issue Joint Final Rule to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Improve Fuel Economy Standards

By: Jessica Albin — Filed under: Clean Air Act, Climate Change Law, Emerging Issues, Transportation — Posted at 3:06 pm

On April 1, the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (“NHTSA”) issued a joint final rule, “Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards,” establishing a National Program to reduce greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions and improve fuel economy.  The National Program creates new standards for cars, light-duty trucks, and medium-duty passenger vehicles for model years 2012-2016.  According to EPA, the new standards will reduce greenhouse gas emissions by approximately 21 percent by 2030 from the light-duty vehicle fleet.  This rule is EPA’s first final rule directly regulating GHG emissions.

EPA’s new GHG standards require that by model year 2016, vehicles have an estimated combined average emissions level of 250 grams of carbon dioxide per mile.  This level would equate to 35.5 miles per gallon (mpg) if the automotive industry met EPA’s requirements completely through fuel economy improvements.  However, the industry may meet this emission level with a combination of improvements such as fuel economy, engine technology, air conditioning units, and tire performance, as well as increased use of hybrid and alternative fuel technologies.

NHTSA’s new Corporate Average Fuel Economy (“CAFE”) standards set fuel economy targets for each light vehicle model produced for sale in the U.S.  By model year 2016, passenger cars and light trucks must meet an estimated combined average of 34.1 mpg.  Because the new fuel economy standards are averaged across the industry, CAFE levels which individual manufacturers must meet may differ, depending upon the type and mix of vehicles in their fleet.

Manufacturers will be able to earn and transfer credits to be used toward achieving fleet-wide standards.  For example, manufacturers that design vehicles to operate on alternative fuels will be eligible for credits.  Credits earned may be averaged, banked for years in which the manufacturer did not meet its CAFE level, or traded between companies. 

According to EPA, the National Program will “reduce[] carbon dioxide emissions by about 960 million metric tons, . . . conserve[] about 1.8 billion barrels of oil,” and save the average car buyer approximately $3,000 over the lifetime of the vehicles regulated.  According to NHTSA, the National Program will provide “lifetime benefits” of over $240 billion, with most of the savings from reduced fuel consumption.  [NHTSA Fact Sheet at 5.] 

Now that GHGs are regulated under the Clean Air Act (“CAA”), it is expected that EPA will regulate stationary sources like power plants, steel mills, and refineries.  Last Fall, EPA proposed a rule (the “Tailoring Rule”) that would require new and existing industrial facilities emitting more than 25,000 tons of GHGs per year to obtain permits under the CAA’s New Source Review and Title V operating permits programs.  Once the Tailoring Rule is finalized, the GHG emissions thresholds for stationary sources will take effect immediately. 

For additional information, see:



April 1, 2010

EPA Releases Review of Federal Drinking Water Standards and Proposes New Strategy for Protecting Drinking Water

By: Vicki Shiah — Filed under: Compliance, Emerging Issues, Enforcement, Safe Drinking Water Act — Posted at 4:28 pm

This month, the EPA completed its second review of National Primary Drinking Water Regulations under the Safe Drinking Water Act (“SDWA”) and published the findings of its review in the Federal Register.  Such reviews are required every six years under Section 1412(b)(9) of the SDWA.  The EPA reviewed existing regulations for 71 contaminants and determined that 67 regulations remain appropriate, while four regulations are in need of revision.  Each regulation covers a single contaminant.

The four regulations found to be in need of revision were those governing acrylamide, epichlorohydrin, tetrachloroethylene, and trichloroethylene.  According to the EPA, “tetrachloroethylene and trichloroethylene are used in industrial and/or textile processing and can be introduced into drinking water from contaminated ground or surface water sources,” and “[a]crylamide and epicholorohydrin are impurities that can be introduced into drinking water during the water treatment process.”  The review states that reevaluations of the health risks posed by exposure to acrylamide, tetrachloroethylene, and trichloroethylene are under way.  The review also concludes that compliance with more stringent limits on the concentration of all four contaminants is feasible and will likely be required under the revised regulations.

The review was published in the Federal Register on March 29, 2010, one week after EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson announced a new drinking water protection strategy. The new strategy is intended to focus on the following four principles that the EPA seeks to promote:

  • Addressing contaminants as a group rather than one at a time so that enhancement of drinking water protection can be achieved more quickly and cost-effectively.
  • Fostering development of new drinking water treatment technologies to address health risks posed by a broad array of contaminants.
  • Using the authority of multiple statutes, including the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (“FIFRA”) and the Toxic Substances Control Act (“TSCA”),  to help protect drinking water.
  • Partnering with states to share more complete data from monitoring at public water systems.

Rules implementing these proposed reforms have not yet been developed, and the EPA’s recent review of National Primary Drinking Water Standards has followed the existing regulatory regime.  It remains to be seen whether, and to what extent, the EPA’s proposed reforms will take root, and may impact revisions to contaminant-specific standards.  Over the next few months, the EPA will seek input on developing its new approach from experts as well as members of the public.




« Newer Posts