<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York Passes Sewage Pollution Right-to-Know Act</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sprlaw.com/2012/08/new-york-passes-sewage-pollution-right-to-know-act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sprlaw.com/2012/08/new-york-passes-sewage-pollution-right-to-know-act/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=new-york-passes-sewage-pollution-right-to-know-act</link>
	<description>Environmental Law News &#38; Updates from Environmental Law Firm Sive, Paget &#38; Riesel PC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 05:43:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: E. Prievo</title>
		<link>http://blog.sprlaw.com/2012/08/new-york-passes-sewage-pollution-right-to-know-act/comment-page-1/#comment-5059</link>
		<dc:creator>E. Prievo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sprlaw.com/?p=1860#comment-5059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Would an overflow from a manhole within the distribution collection system be subject to this new requirement?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would an overflow from a manhole within the distribution collection system be subject to this new requirement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Kamlet</title>
		<link>http://blog.sprlaw.com/2012/08/new-york-passes-sewage-pollution-right-to-know-act/comment-page-1/#comment-3531</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Kamlet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sprlaw.com/?p=1860#comment-3531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike L.,

What about a POTW, such as the Binghamton-Johnson City Joint Treatment Plant, which had a wall collapse in a treatment cell and subsequently sustained (unrelated) major damage due to record flooding in Sept. 2011?  As a result of these separate disasters, incompletely treated sewage will continue to be discharged until costly repairs can be accomplished.  What reporting obligations would be imposed on such a facility under the new law?  Must separate reports be filed repeatedly?  Or is a single report sufficient until circumstances change?

Ken]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike L.,</p>
<p>What about a POTW, such as the Binghamton-Johnson City Joint Treatment Plant, which had a wall collapse in a treatment cell and subsequently sustained (unrelated) major damage due to record flooding in Sept. 2011?  As a result of these separate disasters, incompletely treated sewage will continue to be discharged until costly repairs can be accomplished.  What reporting obligations would be imposed on such a facility under the new law?  Must separate reports be filed repeatedly?  Or is a single report sufficient until circumstances change?</p>
<p>Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
